Eswatini vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Eswatini
40,000 current US$
in 2007
Uzbekistan
40,000 current US$
in 2008
Eswatini rank
113th
Uzbekistan rank
113th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Eswatini
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 40,000 current US$ against 40,000 current US$ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 113th and Uzbekistan ranks 113th of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.17 million current US$ | 87,143 current US$ | 1.08 million current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 356,250 current US$ | 528,750 current US$ | 172,500 current US$ | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Eswatini or Uzbekistan?
- Eswatini, at 40,000 current US$ against 40,000 current US$ in Uzbekistan as of 2007.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Eswatini and Uzbekistan?
- 0 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2007.
- How do Eswatini and Uzbekistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Eswatini ranks 113th and Uzbekistan ranks 113th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.