Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 40,000 current US$ in 2008. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2008)
40,000 current US$
Change on year
down 42.9%
World rank
113th
of 163 countries
All-time high
1.12 million current US$
in 2001
All-time low
10,000 current US$
in 1999
Years of data
16
1993–2008

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Uzbekistan, 1993–2008

0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1993200020081993: 20.0k current US$1994: 30.0k current US$1995: 80.0k current US$1996: 120.0k current US$1997: 160.0k current US$1998: 190.0k current US$1999: 10.0k current US$2000: 20.0k current US$2001: 1.1M current US$2002: 710.0k current US$2003: 1.1M current US$2004: 660.0k current US$2005: 490.0k current US$2006: 40.0k current US$2007: 70.0k current US$2008: 40.0k current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

In 2008, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Uzbekistan stood at 40,000 current US$.

The figure is down 42.9% on the previous year and down 78.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Uzbekistan peaked at 1.12 million current US$ in 2001 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1999.

That places Uzbekistan 113th out of 163 countries with data for 2008, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Uzbekistan, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled in Uzbekistan, 1993 to 2008.
Year current US$ Change
1993 20,000 current US$
1994 30,000 current US$ +50.0%
1995 80,000 current US$ +166.7%
1996 120,000 current US$ +50.0%
1997 160,000 current US$ +33.3%
1998 190,000 current US$ +18.8%
1999 10,000 current US$ -94.7%
2000 20,000 current US$ +100.0%
2001 1.12 million current US$ +5500.0%
2002 710,000 current US$ -36.6%
2003 1.12 million current US$ +57.7%
2004 660,000 current US$ -41.1%
2005 490,000 current US$ -25.8%
2006 40,000 current US$ -91.8%
2007 70,000 current US$ +75.0%
2008 40,000 current US$ -42.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 87,143 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 190,000 current US$ 7
2000s 474,444 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 1.12 million current US$ 9

Countries ranked near Uzbekistan

  1. 110 Cape Verde 47,639 current US$ compare
  2. 111 Timor-Leste 44,236 current US$ compare
  3. 112 Montenegro 42,065 current US$
  4. 113 Bahrain 40,000 current US$ compare
  5. 113 Eswatini 40,000 current US$ compare
  6. 116 Panama 36,301 current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 209 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Uzbekistan

All data for Uzbekistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Uzbekistan?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Uzbekistan was 40,000 current US$ in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Uzbekistan?
The highest recorded value was 1.12 million current US$ in 2001.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Uzbekistan?
The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1999.
How does Uzbekistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Uzbekistan ranks 113th out of 163 countries with data for 2008.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
Over the last ten years it is down 78.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Uzbekistan. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-gaps-filled/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-gaps-filled/uzbekistan/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Uzbekistan</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 8,611 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.