Europe & Central Asia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Europe & Central Asia
12.91 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
115.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Europe & Central Asia rank
20th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 115.39 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 102.48 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 8.9 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 20th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 21st of 44 groups.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre 3,141 current US$ per square kilometre 3,136 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre 192.31 current US$ per square kilometre 185.65 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Europe & Central Asia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 115.39 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Europe & Central Asia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
102.48 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2002.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 20th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 21st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Europe & Central Asia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.