Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
12.91 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 94.7%
Rank
20th
of 44 groups
All-time high
12.91 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
-0.3818 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1985
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia recorded 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2023. That is the highest value across all 62 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 94.7% on the previous year and up 2,604.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.3818 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1985.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 20th of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -0.0913 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.0% |
| 1963 | 0.4932 current US$ per square kilometre | -9100.0% |
| 1964 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +385.2% |
| 1965 | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 1967 | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.6% |
| 1968 | 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.0% |
| 1969 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.0% |
| 1970 | 0.2155 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.6% |
| 1971 | 0.2137 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1972 | 0.2338 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1973 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +638.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0475 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.2% |
| 1975 | 0.1973 current US$ per square kilometre | +315.4% |
| 1976 | 0.084 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.4% |
| 1977 | 0.8056 current US$ per square kilometre | +858.7% |
| 1978 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.3% |
| 1979 | 0.8787 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 1980 | 0.5553 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 1981 | 0.5681 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1982 | 0.2521 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1983 | 0.0767 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.6% |
| 1984 | -0.0493 current US$ per square kilometre | -164.3% |
| 1985 | -0.3818 current US$ per square kilometre | +674.1% |
| 1986 | -0.1187 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.9% |
| 1987 | 0.106 current US$ per square kilometre | -189.2% |
| 1988 | 0.3781 current US$ per square kilometre | +256.9% |
| 1989 | 0.2595 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.4% |
| 1990 | 0.3746 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 1991 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +284.9% |
| 1992 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1993 | 6.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +311.6% |
| 1994 | 4.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 1995 | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 1996 | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1997 | 4.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1998 | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1999 | 6.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 2000 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2001 | 7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2002 | 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 2003 | 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 2004 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2005 | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2006 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 2007 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 2008 | 3.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.7% |
| 2009 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 2010 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.1% |
| 2011 | 0.8939 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.1% |
| 2012 | 0.6448 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 2013 | 0.4773 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 2014 | 0.4706 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2015 | 0.3753 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 2016 | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +1058.0% |
| 2017 | 0.408 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.6% |
| 2018 | 0.4903 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2019 | 0.277 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.5% |
| 2020 | 0.3526 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 2021 | 0.2049 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 2022 | 6.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +3136.4% |
| 2023 | 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0913 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.5613 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0475 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1646 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3818 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5681 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3746 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9954 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.277 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2049 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 17 Jordan 169.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Tunisia 146.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 128.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Ethiopia 125.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Saint Kitts and Nevis 115.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Rwanda 112.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Burkina Faso 108.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia was 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3818 current US$ per square kilometre in 1985.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 20th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2,604.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.