OECD members vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

OECD members
0.0861 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
20.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
OECD members rank
42nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • OECD members
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02505007501.0k197019962022

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0861 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 20.74 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 242.1 times OECD members's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 44 groups.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5348 current US$ per square kilometre 502.6 current US$ per square kilometre 502.07 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.8415 current US$ per square kilometre 312.5 current US$ per square kilometre 311.66 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre 93.75 current US$ per square kilometre 92.16 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre 41.67 current US$ per square kilometre 40.31 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), OECD members or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0861 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between OECD members and Sao Tome and Principe?
20.74 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Sao Tome and Principe?
22 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2002.
How do OECD members and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
OECD members ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/sao-tome-and-principe/">OECD members vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.