Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 0.0861 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in OECD members, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in OECD members is 0.0861 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 47.3% on the previous year and down 81.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in OECD members peaked at 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2020.
OECD members ranks 42nd of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in OECD members, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.1678 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.1149 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 1972 | 0.1175 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1973 | 0.4958 current US$ per square kilometre | +322.0% |
| 1974 | 0.2879 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 1975 | 0.3069 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1976 | 0.4136 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1977 | 0.5305 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1978 | 0.6136 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1979 | 0.5814 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1980 | 0.6986 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 1981 | 0.9305 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.2% |
| 1982 | 0.7109 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 1983 | 0.5103 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 1984 | 0.5522 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1985 | 0.6933 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 1986 | 0.7823 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1987 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1988 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1989 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1990 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.7% |
| 1991 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1992 | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1993 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 1994 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1995 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1996 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 1997 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1998 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 1999 | 0.514 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.2% |
| 2000 | 0.5093 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2001 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +228.3% |
| 2002 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.7% |
| 2003 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2004 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.8% |
| 2005 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 2006 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2007 | 0.8109 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.1% |
| 2008 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 2009 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2010 | 0.8476 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 2011 | 0.7168 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2012 | 0.4745 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 2013 | 0.4818 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2014 | 0.1643 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.9% |
| 2015 | 0.1406 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2016 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +2151.8% |
| 2017 | 0.2048 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.5% |
| 2018 | 0.3749 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.1% |
| 2019 | 0.2161 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.4% |
| 2020 | 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.8% |
| 2021 | 0.1634 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.3% |
| 2022 | 0.0861 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.3% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in OECD members changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | +2151.8% | 0.1406 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1973 | +322.0% | 0.1175 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4958 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.363 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1149 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6136 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.8207 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5103 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.514 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5093 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6788 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1406 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1077 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1634 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 39 Czechia 28.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Somalia 25.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Guinea 25.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Kiribati 24.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Barbados 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Sao Tome and Principe 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Iraq 20.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in OECD members was 0.0861 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- OECD members ranks 42nd out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is down 81.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.