Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
9.01 million current US$
in 2022
Rwanda
859,528 current US$
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
27th
Rwanda rank
30th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Rwanda
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M197219972023

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 9.01 million current US$ against 859,528 current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 8.15 million current US$.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 10.5 times Rwanda's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 30th of 45 groups.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 2.49 million current US$ 439,167 current US$ 2.05 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2000s 10.52 million current US$ 82,500 current US$ 10.44 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 7.74 million current US$ 137,801 current US$ 7.60 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 9.62 million current US$ 985,990 current US$ 8.63 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Rwanda?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 9.01 million current US$ against 859,528 current US$ in Rwanda as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Rwanda?
8.15 million current US$, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Rwanda?
23 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 30th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/rwanda/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 5,626 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.