Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) was 9.01 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1972–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) recorded 9.01 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in 2022.
That represents a change of down 21.0% on the previous year and down 51.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 22.34 million current US$ in 2005 and was at its lowest, 60,000 current US$, in 1972.
That places Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) 27th out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 60,000 current US$ | — |
| 1973 | 120,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 160,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1975 | 1.22 million current US$ | +662.5% |
| 1976 | 600,000 current US$ | -50.8% |
| 1977 | 480,000 current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1978 | 950,000 current US$ | +97.9% |
| 1979 | 870,000 current US$ | -8.4% |
| 1980 | 1.24 million current US$ | +42.5% |
| 1981 | 800,000 current US$ | -35.5% |
| 1982 | 140,000 current US$ | -82.5% |
| 1983 | 80,000 current US$ | -42.9% |
| 1984 | 90,000 current US$ | +12.5% |
| 1985 | 100,000 current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1986 | 110,000 current US$ | +10.0% |
| 1987 | 130,000 current US$ | +18.2% |
| 1988 | 450,000 current US$ | +246.2% |
| 1989 | 290,000 current US$ | -35.6% |
| 1990 | 380,000 current US$ | +31.0% |
| 1991 | 360,000 current US$ | -5.3% |
| 1992 | 230,000 current US$ | -36.1% |
| 1993 | 600,000 current US$ | +160.9% |
| 1994 | 2.55 million current US$ | +325.0% |
| 1995 | 2.08 million current US$ | -18.4% |
| 1996 | 2.24 million current US$ | +7.7% |
| 1997 | 3.31 million current US$ | +47.8% |
| 1998 | 1.87 million current US$ | -43.5% |
| 1999 | 2.88 million current US$ | +54.0% |
| 2000 | 3.09 million current US$ | +7.3% |
| 2001 | 3.82 million current US$ | +23.6% |
| 2002 | 6.43 million current US$ | +68.3% |
| 2003 | 9.04 million current US$ | +40.6% |
| 2004 | 19.28 million current US$ | +113.3% |
| 2005 | 22.34 million current US$ | +15.9% |
| 2006 | 9.59 million current US$ | -57.1% |
| 2007 | 10.59 million current US$ | +10.4% |
| 2008 | 15.61 million current US$ | +47.4% |
| 2009 | 9.98 million current US$ | -36.1% |
| 2010 | 7.78 million current US$ | -22.0% |
| 2011 | 13.01 million current US$ | +67.2% |
| 2012 | 18.72 million current US$ | +43.9% |
| 2013 | 8.92 million current US$ | -52.4% |
| 2014 | 7.88 million current US$ | -11.7% |
| 2015 | 6.81 million current US$ | -13.6% |
| 2016 | 6.69 million current US$ | -1.8% |
| 2017 | 10.78 million current US$ | +61.1% |
| 2018 | 5.45 million current US$ | -49.4% |
| 2019 | 8.84 million current US$ | +62.2% |
| 2020 | 8.44 million current US$ | -4.5% |
| 2021 | 11.40 million current US$ | +35.1% |
| 2022 | 9.01 million current US$ | -21.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 557,500 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 1.22 million current US$ | 8 |
| 1980s | 343,000 current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | 1.24 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.65 million current US$ | 230,000 current US$ | 3.31 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.98 million current US$ | 3.09 million current US$ | 22.34 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.49 million current US$ | 5.45 million current US$ | 18.72 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.62 million current US$ | 8.44 million current US$ | 11.40 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 24 Somalia 1.69 million current US$ compare
- 24 South Sudan 1.69 million current US$ compare
- 26 Burundi 1.25 million current US$ compare
- 27 Pakistan 1.24 million current US$ compare
- 28 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1.06 million current US$ compare
- 29 Yemen 920,923 current US$ compare
- 30 Rwanda 859,528 current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 9.01 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 22.34 million current US$ in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 60,000 current US$ in 1972.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 51.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.