Bhutan vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Bhutan
5.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
OECD members
0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Bhutan rank
42nd
OECD members rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Bhutan
  • OECD members
0246810197219972022

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 5.19 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 312.1 times OECD members's.

Across all 41 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 42nd and OECD members ranks 43rd of 112 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0107 current US$ per square kilometre 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0024 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4256 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0138 current US$ per square kilometre 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre 0.021 current US$ per square kilometre 5.64 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0312 current US$ per square kilometre 5.35 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0208 current US$ per square kilometre 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Bhutan or OECD members?
Bhutan, at 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2021.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Bhutan and OECD members?
5.19 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and OECD members?
41 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2021.
How do Bhutan and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Bhutan ranks 42nd and OECD members ranks 43rd of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/oecd-members/">Bhutan vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.