Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps

Least developed countries
772.98 million current US$
in 2022
Malawi
51.76 million current US$
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
13th
Malawi rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Malawi
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B196619942023

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 772.98 million current US$ against 51.76 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 721.22 million current US$.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 14.9 times Malawi's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 11th of 45 groups.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 32.77 million current US$ 27,500 current US$ 32.75 million current US$ Least developed countries
1980s 202.84 million current US$ 943,571 current US$ 201.90 million current US$ Least developed countries
1990s 362.89 million current US$ 6.37 million current US$ 356.51 million current US$ Least developed countries
2000s 672.71 million current US$ 36.96 million current US$ 635.75 million current US$ Least developed countries
2010s 863.16 million current US$ 70.10 million current US$ 793.06 million current US$ Least developed countries
2020s 769.95 million current US$ 52.03 million current US$ 717.92 million current US$ Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Least developed countries or Malawi?
Least developed countries, at 772.98 million current US$ against 51.76 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Least developed countries and Malawi?
721.22 million current US$, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Malawi?
44 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2022.
How do Least developed countries and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
Least developed countries ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malawi/">Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.