Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries

Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 772.98 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
772.98 million current US$
Change on year
down 0.3%
Rank
13th
of 45 groups
All-time high
1.07 billion current US$
in 2008
All-time low
3.60 million current US$
in 1970
Years of data
53
1970–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries, 1970–2022

0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B197019962022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

Least developed countries recorded 772.98 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in 2022.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.3% on the previous year and down 16.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries peaked at 1.07 billion current US$ in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3.60 million current US$, in 1970.

Least developed countries ranks 13th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled in Least developed countries, 1970 to 2022.
Year current US$ Change
1970 3.60 million current US$
1971 8.58 million current US$ +138.3%
1972 14.64 million current US$ +70.6%
1973 17.23 million current US$ +17.7%
1974 31.36 million current US$ +82.0%
1975 39.13 million current US$ +24.8%
1976 43.38 million current US$ +10.9%
1977 72.99 million current US$ +68.3%
1978 88.37 million current US$ +21.1%
1979 107.47 million current US$ +21.6%
1980 110.64 million current US$ +2.9%
1981 109.85 million current US$ -0.7%
1982 150.70 million current US$ +37.2%
1983 151.56 million current US$ +0.6%
1984 127.98 million current US$ -15.6%
1985 156.25 million current US$ +22.1%
1986 234.14 million current US$ +49.8%
1987 221.05 million current US$ -5.6%
1988 276.01 million current US$ +24.9%
1989 252.88 million current US$ -8.4%
1990 355.72 million current US$ +40.7%
1991 361.50 million current US$ +1.6%
1992 399.69 million current US$ +10.6%
1993 313.13 million current US$ -21.7%
1994 363.01 million current US$ +15.9%
1995 369.66 million current US$ +1.8%
1996 392.04 million current US$ +6.1%
1997 378.08 million current US$ -3.6%
1998 362.40 million current US$ -4.1%
1999 333.63 million current US$ -7.9%
2000 310.67 million current US$ -6.9%
2001 314.67 million current US$ +1.3%
2002 450.46 million current US$ +43.2%
2003 577.39 million current US$ +28.2%
2004 617.20 million current US$ +6.9%
2005 710.13 million current US$ +15.1%
2006 805.81 million current US$ +13.5%
2007 966.13 million current US$ +19.9%
2008 1.07 billion current US$ +11.0%
2009 901.83 million current US$ -15.9%
2010 997.16 million current US$ +10.6%
2011 1.07 billion current US$ +7.2%
2012 927.05 million current US$ -13.3%
2013 1.05 billion current US$ +13.6%
2014 965.23 million current US$ -8.4%
2015 727.93 million current US$ -24.6%
2016 658.78 million current US$ -9.5%
2017 732.93 million current US$ +11.3%
2018 768.83 million current US$ +4.9%
2019 731.19 million current US$ -4.9%
2020 761.63 million current US$ +4.2%
2021 775.24 million current US$ +1.8%
2022 772.98 million current US$ -0.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 42.67 million current US$ 3.60 million current US$ 107.47 million current US$ 10
1980s 179.11 million current US$ 109.85 million current US$ 276.01 million current US$ 10
1990s 362.89 million current US$ 313.13 million current US$ 399.69 million current US$ 10
2000s 672.71 million current US$ 310.67 million current US$ 1.07 billion current US$ 10
2010s 863.16 million current US$ 658.78 million current US$ 1.07 billion current US$ 10
2020s 769.95 million current US$ 761.63 million current US$ 775.24 million current US$ 3

Countries ranked near Least developed countries

  1. 10 Mozambique 56.82 million current US$ compare
  2. 11 Malawi 51.76 million current US$ compare
  3. 12 Tanzania, United Republic of 51.14 million current US$ compare
  4. 13 Sudan 49.38 million current US$ compare
  5. 14 Lebanon 43.06 million current US$ compare
  6. 15 Colombia 42.42 million current US$ compare
  7. 16 Uganda 41.41 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Least developed countries

All data for Least developed countries →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries was 772.98 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Least developed countries?
The highest recorded value was 1.07 billion current US$ in 2008.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Least developed countries?
The lowest recorded value was 3.60 million current US$ in 1970.
How does Least developed countries rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
Least developed countries ranks 13th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Least developed countries?
Over the last ten years it is down 16.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Least developed countries data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.