Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Bosnia and Herzegovina
20.18 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17.6 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Zimbabwe
02505007501.0k198020012023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 20.18 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 142 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 770.38 current US$ per square kilometre 42.21 current US$ per square kilometre 728.17 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 388.77 current US$ per square kilometre 33.44 current US$ per square kilometre 355.33 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 217.9 current US$ per square kilometre 48.04 current US$ per square kilometre 169.87 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 52.08 current US$ per square kilometre 15.7 current US$ per square kilometre 36.38 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zimbabwe?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 20.18 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
2.58 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zimbabwe/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.