Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Zimbabwe stood at 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 12.8% on the previous year and down 80.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Zimbabwe peaked at 88.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 11.68 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 142 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 44 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 11.68 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 18.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.0% |
| 1982 | 22.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1983 | 22.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1984 | 35.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.1% |
| 1985 | 21.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 1986 | 42.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.3% |
| 1987 | 56.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.7% |
| 1988 | 61.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1989 | 44.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 1990 | 62.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.6% |
| 1991 | 56.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1992 | 71.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 1993 | 39.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.3% |
| 1994 | 44.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1995 | 46.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1996 | 50.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1997 | 41.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1998 | 35.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1999 | 34.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2000 | 25.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 2001 | 26.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2002 | 18.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 2003 | 17.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2004 | 20.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2005 | 35.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.4% |
| 2006 | 28.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 2007 | 32.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2008 | 54.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.9% |
| 2009 | 74.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 2010 | 63.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2011 | 58.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2012 | 70.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2013 | 88.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2014 | 54.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 2015 | 42.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 2016 | 27.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 2017 | 27.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2018 | 28.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2019 | 19.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 2020 | 15.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2021 | 14.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2022 | 15.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2023 | 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 33.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 48.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 71.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 33.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 74.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 48.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 88.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 45 Burkina Faso 20.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Bosnia and Herzegovina 20.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Hong Kong, China 19.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Türkiye 17.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 50 Pakistan 16.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 51 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 15.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Zimbabwe was 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 88.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.68 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Zimbabwe ranks 48th out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 80.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.