Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Türkiye
17.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17.6 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Türkiye rank
49th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Türkiye
  • Zimbabwe
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Türkiye, a difference of 0.51 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Türkiye ahead.

Türkiye ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 142 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Türkiye Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre 34.94 current US$ per square kilometre 33.16 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre 49.22 current US$ per square kilometre 48.04 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre 33.44 current US$ per square kilometre 30.65 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre 48.04 current US$ per square kilometre 41.78 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre 15.7 current US$ per square kilometre 6.98 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Türkiye or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Türkiye and Zimbabwe?
0.51 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Zimbabwe?
42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Türkiye and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Türkiye ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turkiye/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turkiye/zimbabwe/">Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.