Georgia vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Georgia
69.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Upper middle income
23.84 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
23rd
Upper middle income rank
20th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Georgia
  • Upper middle income
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 69.93 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income, a difference of 46.09 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 2.9 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 23rd and Upper middle income ranks 20th of 142 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 24.68 current US$ per square kilometre 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre 21.11 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 94.8 current US$ per square kilometre 5.22 current US$ per square kilometre 89.58 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 89.07 current US$ per square kilometre 8.74 current US$ per square kilometre 80.33 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 71.14 current US$ per square kilometre 13.57 current US$ per square kilometre 57.56 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Georgia or Upper middle income?
Georgia, at 69.93 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Georgia and Upper middle income?
46.09 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Upper middle income?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Upper middle income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Georgia ranks 23rd and Upper middle income ranks 20th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/upper-middle-income/">Georgia vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.