Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Upper middle income stood at 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 25.9% on the previous year and up 19.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Upper middle income 20th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.0135 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.8% |
| 1966 | 0.014 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1967 | 0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.7% |
| 1968 | 0.014 current US$ per square kilometre | +600.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.4% |
| 1970 | 0.0232 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.0% |
| 1972 | 0.028 current US$ per square kilometre | +761.5% |
| 1973 | 0.0217 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 1974 | 0.1533 current US$ per square kilometre | +605.7% |
| 1975 | 0.2048 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 1976 | 0.3084 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.6% |
| 1977 | 0.3514 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1978 | 0.4173 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1979 | 0.7058 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.1% |
| 1980 | 0.9415 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1981 | 0.4143 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.0% |
| 1982 | 0.5422 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1983 | 0.6248 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1984 | 0.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1985 | 0.6308 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1986 | 0.8728 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.4% |
| 1987 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 1988 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1989 | 0.961 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1990 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 1991 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 1992 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1993 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1994 | 3.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.0% |
| 1995 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1996 | 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1997 | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1998 | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1999 | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.5% |
| 2000 | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2001 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2002 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2003 | 5.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 2004 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2005 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 2006 | 4.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 2007 | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.6% |
| 2008 | 5.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 2009 | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2010 | 6.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 2011 | 7.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2012 | 8.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2013 | 20.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +139.4% |
| 2014 | 8.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 2015 | 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2016 | 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2017 | 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2018 | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2019 | 6.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2020 | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2021 | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2022 | 18.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +224.9% |
| 2023 | 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2217 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7058 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.7854 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4143 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 13.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 17 Bangladesh 121.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Somalia 114.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Sri Lanka 74.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Liberia 72.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Mozambique 72.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Ethiopia 71.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Georgia 69.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 20th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 19.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.