Low & middle income vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway … Norway square

Low & middle income
53.6 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Moldova
2,297 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
2nd
Moldova rank
3rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway … Norway square over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Moldova
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 2,297 current US$ per square kilometre against 53.6 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 2,243 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Moldova's figure about 42.9 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Moldova ahead.

Low & middle income ranks 2nd and Moldova ranks 3rd of 44 groups.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 25.21 current US$ per square kilometre 71.76 current US$ per square kilometre 46.55 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2010s 44.24 current US$ per square kilometre 143.55 current US$ per square kilometre 99.3 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2020s 46.76 current US$ per square kilometre 826.77 current US$ per square kilometre 780 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Low & middle income or Moldova?
Moldova, at 2,297 current US$ per square kilometre against 53.6 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Low & middle income and Moldova?
2,243 current US$ per square kilometre, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Moldova?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Moldova rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Low & middle income ranks 2nd and Moldova ranks 3rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/moldova/">Low & middle income vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.