Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 53.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
53.6 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 4.4%
Rank
2nd
of 44 groups
All-time high
54.46 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
All-time low
0.0116 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Low & middle income recorded 53.6 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 4.4% on the previous year and down 1.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Low & middle income peaked at 54.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0116 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Low & middle income ranks 2nd of 44 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0116 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.013 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1963 | 0.0272 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.9% |
| 1964 | 0.031 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1965 | 0.0456 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0669 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0559 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1968 | 0.178 current US$ per square kilometre | +218.7% |
| 1969 | 0.1921 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1970 | 0.2067 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1971 | 0.2597 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 1972 | 0.4381 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.7% |
| 1973 | 0.5766 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 1974 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 1975 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 1976 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1977 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.3% |
| 1978 | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1979 | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 1980 | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1981 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1982 | 4.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1983 | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1984 | 4.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1985 | 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1986 | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 1987 | 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1988 | 8.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1989 | 7.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1990 | 10.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 1991 | 10.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1992 | 10.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1993 | 8.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1994 | 10.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 1995 | 11.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1996 | 12.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1997 | 11.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1998 | 12.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1999 | 13.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2000 | 12.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2001 | 12.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2002 | 14.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 2003 | 18.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 2004 | 19.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2005 | 26.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 2006 | 28.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2007 | 37.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.7% |
| 2008 | 40.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2009 | 41.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2010 | 43.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2011 | 46.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2012 | 44.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2013 | 54.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2014 | 47.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2015 | 41.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2016 | 43.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2017 | 39.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 2018 | 40.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2019 | 40.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 38.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2021 | 43.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2022 | 51.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2023 | 53.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.069 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0116 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1921 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2067 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 25.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 44.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 54.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 46.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 1 Palestine, State of 19,051 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Lebanon 4,209 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Republic of Moldova 2,297 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Ukraine 1,299 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Malawi 549.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Low & middle income was 53.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 54.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0116 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Low & middle income ranks 2nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.