Central Europe and the Baltics vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps

Central Europe and the Baltics
440,000 current US$
in 2010
Equatorial Guinea
3.63 million current US$
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
39th
Equatorial Guinea rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Equatorial Guinea
010.0M20.0M198720052023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3.63 million current US$ against 440,000 current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 3.19 million current US$.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 8.2 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 39th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 38th of 46 groups.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 4.41 million current US$ 13.43 million current US$ 9.02 million current US$ Equatorial Guinea
2000s 3.03 million current US$ 15.15 million current US$ 12.12 million current US$ Equatorial Guinea
2010s 440,000 current US$ 19.70 million current US$ 19.26 million current US$ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Central Europe and the Baltics or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 3.63 million current US$ against 440,000 current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea?
3.19 million current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea?
20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 39th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 38th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-gaps-filled/central-europe-and-the-baltics/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-gaps-filled/central-europe-and-the-baltics/equatorial-guinea/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 5,623 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.