Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps was 440,000 current US$ in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1991–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps in Central Europe and the Baltics is 440,000 current US$, measured in 2010.
The figure is down 37.1% on the previous year and down 93.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 23.15 million current US$ in 1991 and was at its lowest, -3.19 million current US$, in 1995.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 39th of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 23.15 million current US$ | — |
| 1992 | 20,000 current US$ | -99.9% |
| 1993 | 140,000 current US$ | +600.0% |
| 1994 | 260,000 current US$ | +85.7% |
| 1995 | -3.19 million current US$ | -1326.9% |
| 1996 | 2.11 million current US$ | -166.1% |
| 1997 | 2.01 million current US$ | -4.7% |
| 1998 | 5.30 million current US$ | +163.7% |
| 1999 | 9.93 million current US$ | +87.4% |
| 2000 | 6.39 million current US$ | -35.6% |
| 2001 | 3.20 million current US$ | -49.9% |
| 2002 | 5.10 million current US$ | +59.4% |
| 2003 | 1.20 million current US$ | -76.5% |
| 2004 | 10.18 million current US$ | +748.3% |
| 2005 | 340,000 current US$ | -96.7% |
| 2006 | 1.18 million current US$ | +247.1% |
| 2007 | 1.06 million current US$ | -10.2% |
| 2008 | 940,000 current US$ | -11.3% |
| 2009 | 700,000 current US$ | -25.5% |
| 2010 | 440,000 current US$ | -37.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.41 million current US$ | -3.19 million current US$ | 23.15 million current US$ | 9 |
| 2000s | 3.03 million current US$ | 340,000 current US$ | 10.18 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 440,000 current US$ | 440,000 current US$ | 440,000 current US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 36 Guinea-Bissau 3.76 million current US$ compare
- 37 Algeria 3.72 million current US$ compare
- 38 Equatorial Guinea 3.63 million current US$ compare
- 39 Russian Federation 3.29 million current US$ compare
- 40 Libya 2.70 million current US$ compare
- 41 South Sudan 2.39 million current US$
- 42 Cape Verde 2.27 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps in Central Europe and the Baltics was 440,000 current US$ in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 23.15 million current US$ in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.19 million current US$ in 1995.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 39th out of 46 groups with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is down 93.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.