Africa Western and Central vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps

Africa Western and Central
187.67 million current US$
in 2019
Rwanda
28.71 million current US$
in 2023
Africa Western and Central rank
26th
Rwanda rank
27th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time

  • Africa Western and Central
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M197019962023

How they compare

Africa Western and Central currently reports 187.67 million current US$ against 28.71 million current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 158.96 million current US$.

That makes Africa Western and Central's figure about 6.5 times Rwanda's.

Across all 38 years both countries report, Africa Western and Central has been ahead every year.

Africa Western and Central ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 46 groups.

Africa Western and Central has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Western and Central Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 11.59 million current US$ 380,000 current US$ 11.21 million current US$ Africa Western and Central
1980s 23.18 million current US$ 480,000 current US$ 22.70 million current US$ Africa Western and Central
1990s 30.30 million current US$ 5.39 million current US$ 24.91 million current US$ Africa Western and Central
2000s 81.71 million current US$ 15.07 million current US$ 66.64 million current US$ Africa Western and Central
2010s 152.37 million current US$ 28.82 million current US$ 123.55 million current US$ Africa Western and Central

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Africa Western and Central or Rwanda?
Africa Western and Central, at 187.67 million current US$ against 28.71 million current US$ in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Africa Western and Central and Rwanda?
158.96 million current US$, with Africa Western and Central ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Western and Central and Rwanda?
38 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2019.
How do Africa Western and Central and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
Africa Western and Central ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Western and Central vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/africa-western-and-central/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/africa-western-and-central/rwanda/">Africa Western and Central vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,726 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.