Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Africa Western and Central
Africa Western and Central: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 187.67 million current US$ in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Africa Western and Central, 1970–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2019, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Africa Western and Central stood at 187.67 million current US$.
That represents a change of down 4.5% on the previous year and up 52.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Africa Western and Central peaked at 196.58 million current US$ in 2018 and was at its lowest, 190,000 current US$, in 1972.
That places Africa Western and Central 26th out of 46 groups with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Africa Western and Central, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 1.15 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 360,000 current US$ | -68.7% |
| 1972 | 190,000 current US$ | -47.2% |
| 1973 | 1.10 million current US$ | +478.9% |
| 1974 | 260,000 current US$ | -76.4% |
| 1975 | 6.03 million current US$ | +2219.2% |
| 1976 | 9.09 million current US$ | +50.7% |
| 1977 | 17.07 million current US$ | +87.8% |
| 1978 | 17.33 million current US$ | +1.5% |
| 1979 | 22.91 million current US$ | +32.2% |
| 1980 | 21.03 million current US$ | -8.2% |
| 1981 | 20.75 million current US$ | -1.3% |
| 1982 | 20.98 million current US$ | +1.1% |
| 1983 | 16.35 million current US$ | -22.1% |
| 1984 | 15.22 million current US$ | -6.9% |
| 1985 | 16.22 million current US$ | +6.6% |
| 1986 | 16.53 million current US$ | +1.9% |
| 1987 | 21.46 million current US$ | +29.8% |
| 1988 | 28.81 million current US$ | +34.2% |
| 1989 | 26.07 million current US$ | -9.5% |
| 1990 | 25.87 million current US$ | -0.8% |
| 1991 | 39.73 million current US$ | +53.6% |
| 1992 | 31.03 million current US$ | -21.9% |
| 1993 | 35.84 million current US$ | +15.5% |
| 1994 | 24.60 million current US$ | -31.4% |
| 1995 | 27.00 million current US$ | +9.8% |
| 1996 | 28.59 million current US$ | +5.9% |
| 1997 | 26.43 million current US$ | -7.6% |
| 1998 | 46.46 million current US$ | +75.8% |
| 1999 | 17.43 million current US$ | -62.5% |
| 2000 | 22.47 million current US$ | +28.9% |
| 2001 | 24.24 million current US$ | +7.9% |
| 2002 | 28.61 million current US$ | +18.0% |
| 2003 | 49.77 million current US$ | +74.0% |
| 2004 | 80.48 million current US$ | +61.7% |
| 2005 | 106.07 million current US$ | +31.8% |
| 2006 | 95.60 million current US$ | -9.9% |
| 2007 | 172.86 million current US$ | +80.8% |
| 2008 | 113.82 million current US$ | -34.2% |
| 2009 | 123.15 million current US$ | +8.2% |
| 2010 | 127.57 million current US$ | +3.6% |
| 2011 | 178.73 million current US$ | +40.1% |
| 2012 | 146.82 million current US$ | -17.9% |
| 2013 | 156.36 million current US$ | +6.5% |
| 2014 | 139.48 million current US$ | -10.8% |
| 2015 | 107.53 million current US$ | -22.9% |
| 2016 | 136.41 million current US$ | +26.9% |
| 2017 | 146.54 million current US$ | +7.4% |
| 2018 | 196.58 million current US$ | +34.1% |
| 2019 | 187.67 million current US$ | -4.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7.55 million current US$ | 190,000 current US$ | 22.91 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 20.34 million current US$ | 15.22 million current US$ | 28.81 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 30.30 million current US$ | 17.43 million current US$ | 46.46 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 81.71 million current US$ | 22.47 million current US$ | 172.86 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 152.37 million current US$ | 107.53 million current US$ | 196.58 million current US$ | 10 |
Countries ranked near Africa Western and Central
- 23 Liberia 33.27 million current US$ compare
- 24 Yemen 32.37 million current US$ compare
- 25 Colombia 30.02 million current US$ compare
- 26 Nigeria 28.74 million current US$ compare
- 27 Rwanda 28.71 million current US$ compare
- 28 Iraq 25.37 million current US$ compare
- 29 Georgia 21.93 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Africa Western and Central
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 16.65 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 125.72 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 310.97 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.72 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 216.58 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.07 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.82 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 592.48 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 88.12 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 363.44 million current US$ (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Africa Western and Central?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Africa Western and Central was 187.67 million current US$ in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The highest recorded value was 196.58 million current US$ in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The lowest recorded value was 190,000 current US$ in 1972.
- How does Africa Western and Central rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Africa Western and Central ranks 26th out of 46 groups with data for 2019.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Africa Western and Central?
- Over the last ten years it is up 52.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Africa Western and Central data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.