Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Liberia
Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 33.27 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Liberia, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Liberia stood at 33.27 million current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.3% on the previous year and down 11.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Liberia peaked at 49.84 million current US$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1970.
That places Liberia 23rd out of 142 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Liberia, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 20,000 current US$ | — |
| 1963 | 470,000 current US$ | +2250.0% |
| 1964 | 670,000 current US$ | +42.6% |
| 1965 | 220,000 current US$ | -67.2% |
| 1966 | 200,000 current US$ | -9.1% |
| 1967 | 180,000 current US$ | -10.0% |
| 1968 | 170,000 current US$ | -5.6% |
| 1969 | 200,000 current US$ | +17.6% |
| 1970 | 10,000 current US$ | -95.0% |
| 1971 | 160,000 current US$ | +1500.0% |
| 1972 | 160,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 50,000 current US$ | -68.8% |
| 1974 | 40,000 current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1979 | 230,000 current US$ | +475.0% |
| 1980 | 300,000 current US$ | +30.4% |
| 1981 | 110,000 current US$ | -63.3% |
| 1982 | 120,000 current US$ | +9.1% |
| 1983 | 85,000 current US$ | -29.2% |
| 1984 | 50,000 current US$ | -41.2% |
| 1985 | 220,000 current US$ | +340.0% |
| 1986 | 190,000 current US$ | -13.6% |
| 1987 | 160,000 current US$ | -15.8% |
| 1988 | 130,000 current US$ | -18.8% |
| 1989 | 95,000 current US$ | -26.9% |
| 1990 | 60,000 current US$ | -36.8% |
| 1991 | 300,000 current US$ | +400.0% |
| 1992 | 3.76 million current US$ | +1153.3% |
| 1993 | 760,000 current US$ | -79.8% |
| 1994 | 1.60 million current US$ | +110.5% |
| 1995 | 1.35 million current US$ | -15.6% |
| 1996 | 2.67 million current US$ | +97.8% |
| 1997 | 5.77 million current US$ | +116.1% |
| 1998 | 7.57 million current US$ | +31.2% |
| 1999 | 3.59 million current US$ | -52.6% |
| 2000 | 1.44 million current US$ | -59.9% |
| 2001 | 1.14 million current US$ | -20.8% |
| 2002 | 1.07 million current US$ | -6.1% |
| 2003 | 5.14 million current US$ | +380.4% |
| 2004 | 12.53 million current US$ | +143.8% |
| 2005 | 14.79 million current US$ | +18.0% |
| 2006 | 15.18 million current US$ | +2.6% |
| 2007 | 19.78 million current US$ | +30.3% |
| 2008 | 26.27 million current US$ | +32.8% |
| 2009 | 41.98 million current US$ | +59.8% |
| 2010 | 26.79 million current US$ | -36.2% |
| 2011 | 49.84 million current US$ | +86.0% |
| 2012 | 40.94 million current US$ | -17.9% |
| 2013 | 37.65 million current US$ | -8.0% |
| 2014 | 38.19 million current US$ | +1.4% |
| 2015 | 26.30 million current US$ | -31.1% |
| 2016 | 25.62 million current US$ | -2.6% |
| 2017 | 24.58 million current US$ | -4.1% |
| 2018 | 39.31 million current US$ | +59.9% |
| 2019 | 34.30 million current US$ | -12.7% |
| 2020 | 35.67 million current US$ | +4.0% |
| 2021 | 45.00 million current US$ | +26.1% |
| 2022 | 31.91 million current US$ | -29.1% |
| 2023 | 33.27 million current US$ | +4.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 266,250 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 670,000 current US$ | 8 |
| 1970s | 108,333 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 230,000 current US$ | 6 |
| 1980s | 146,000 current US$ | 50,000 current US$ | 300,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.74 million current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 7.57 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.93 million current US$ | 1.07 million current US$ | 41.98 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 34.35 million current US$ | 24.58 million current US$ | 49.84 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 36.46 million current US$ | 31.91 million current US$ | 45.00 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Liberia
More aid effectiveness data for Liberia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 41,902 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 736 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 59.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 29,494 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86,452 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 9.13 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Liberia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Liberia was 33.27 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Liberia?
- The highest recorded value was 49.84 million current US$ in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Liberia?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1970.
- How does Liberia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Liberia ranks 23rd out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Liberia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Liberia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.