Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 33.86 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Zimbabwe, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Zimbabwe is 33.86 million current US$, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.8% on the previous year and down 8.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Zimbabwe peaked at 64.55 million current US$ in 1992 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1963.
Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 142 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1964 | 45,000 current US$ | +350.0% |
| 1965 | 80,000 current US$ | +77.8% |
| 1966 | 50,000 current US$ | -37.5% |
| 1967 | 20,000 current US$ | -60.0% |
| 1968 | 70,000 current US$ | +250.0% |
| 1969 | 50,000 current US$ | -28.6% |
| 1970 | 60,000 current US$ | +20.0% |
| 1971 | 70,000 current US$ | +16.7% |
| 1972 | 30,000 current US$ | -57.1% |
| 1980 | 11.47 million current US$ | +38133.3% |
| 1981 | 11.00 million current US$ | -4.1% |
| 1982 | 10.11 million current US$ | -8.1% |
| 1983 | 15.26 million current US$ | +50.9% |
| 1984 | 19.44 million current US$ | +27.4% |
| 1985 | 23.53 million current US$ | +21.0% |
| 1986 | 20.85 million current US$ | -11.4% |
| 1987 | 32.91 million current US$ | +57.8% |
| 1988 | 23.09 million current US$ | -29.8% |
| 1989 | 21.78 million current US$ | -5.7% |
| 1990 | 36.35 million current US$ | +66.9% |
| 1991 | 36.06 million current US$ | -0.8% |
| 1992 | 64.55 million current US$ | +79.0% |
| 1993 | 35.79 million current US$ | -44.6% |
| 1994 | 33.95 million current US$ | -5.1% |
| 1995 | 28.98 million current US$ | -14.6% |
| 1996 | 35.94 million current US$ | +24.0% |
| 1997 | 22.90 million current US$ | -36.3% |
| 1998 | 19.74 million current US$ | -13.8% |
| 1999 | 19.11 million current US$ | -3.2% |
| 2000 | 14.79 million current US$ | -22.6% |
| 2001 | 8.22 million current US$ | -44.4% |
| 2002 | 8.26 million current US$ | +0.5% |
| 2003 | 10.13 million current US$ | +22.6% |
| 2004 | 12.88 million current US$ | +27.1% |
| 2005 | 15.09 million current US$ | +17.2% |
| 2006 | 17.81 million current US$ | +18.0% |
| 2007 | 19.71 million current US$ | +10.7% |
| 2008 | 25.74 million current US$ | +30.6% |
| 2009 | 29.37 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 2010 | 30.37 million current US$ | +3.4% |
| 2011 | 38.58 million current US$ | +27.0% |
| 2012 | 39.76 million current US$ | +3.1% |
| 2013 | 36.91 million current US$ | -7.2% |
| 2014 | 34.71 million current US$ | -6.0% |
| 2015 | 29.18 million current US$ | -15.9% |
| 2016 | 28.51 million current US$ | -2.3% |
| 2017 | 37.12 million current US$ | +30.2% |
| 2018 | 42.53 million current US$ | +14.6% |
| 2019 | 48.64 million current US$ | +14.4% |
| 2020 | 46.79 million current US$ | -3.8% |
| 2021 | 47.95 million current US$ | +2.5% |
| 2022 | 32.93 million current US$ | -31.3% |
| 2023 | 33.86 million current US$ | +2.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 46,429 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | 7 |
| 1970s | 53,333 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 3 |
| 1980s | 18.94 million current US$ | 10.11 million current US$ | 32.91 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 33.34 million current US$ | 19.11 million current US$ | 64.55 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 16.20 million current US$ | 8.22 million current US$ | 29.37 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 36.63 million current US$ | 28.51 million current US$ | 48.64 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 40.38 million current US$ | 32.93 million current US$ | 47.95 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Zimbabwe was 33.86 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 64.55 million current US$ in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1963.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Zimbabwe ranks 22nd out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.