Bulgaria vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Bulgaria
- Eswatini
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 800,000 current US$ against 693,092 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 106,908 current US$.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 95th and Eswatini ranks 97th of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41,250 current US$ | 301,875 current US$ | 260,625 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 326,000 current US$ | 110,000 current US$ | 216,000 current US$ | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Bulgaria or Eswatini?
- Bulgaria, at 800,000 current US$ against 693,092 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Bulgaria and Eswatini?
- 106,908 current US$, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Bulgaria and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Bulgaria ranks 95th and Eswatini ranks 97th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.