Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Eswatini
Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 693,092 current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Eswatini, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Eswatini is 693,092 current US$, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 39.8% on the previous year and down 5.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Eswatini peaked at 4.11 million current US$ in 1981 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1965.
Eswatini ranks 97th of 142 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1966 | 70,000 current US$ | +600.0% |
| 1967 | 130,000 current US$ | +85.7% |
| 1968 | 40,000 current US$ | -69.2% |
| 1969 | 90,000 current US$ | +125.0% |
| 1970 | 140,000 current US$ | +55.6% |
| 1971 | 210,000 current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1972 | 820,000 current US$ | +290.5% |
| 1973 | 660,000 current US$ | -19.5% |
| 1974 | 1.50 million current US$ | +127.3% |
| 1975 | 2.25 million current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1976 | 1.34 million current US$ | -40.4% |
| 1977 | 1.02 million current US$ | -23.9% |
| 1978 | 3.13 million current US$ | +206.9% |
| 1979 | 790,000 current US$ | -74.8% |
| 1980 | 1.64 million current US$ | +107.6% |
| 1981 | 4.11 million current US$ | +150.6% |
| 1982 | 1.15 million current US$ | -72.0% |
| 1983 | 780,000 current US$ | -32.2% |
| 1984 | 3.40 million current US$ | +335.9% |
| 1985 | 550,000 current US$ | -83.8% |
| 1986 | 2.45 million current US$ | +345.5% |
| 1987 | 260,000 current US$ | -89.4% |
| 1988 | 435,000 current US$ | +67.3% |
| 1989 | 610,000 current US$ | +40.2% |
| 1990 | 785,000 current US$ | +28.7% |
| 1991 | 960,000 current US$ | +22.3% |
| 1992 | 670,000 current US$ | -30.2% |
| 1993 | 380,000 current US$ | -43.3% |
| 1994 | 160,000 current US$ | -57.9% |
| 1995 | 490,000 current US$ | +206.2% |
| 1996 | 450,000 current US$ | -8.2% |
| 1997 | 120,000 current US$ | -73.3% |
| 1998 | 90,000 current US$ | -25.0% |
| 1999 | 55,000 current US$ | -38.9% |
| 2000 | 20,000 current US$ | -63.6% |
| 2001 | 100,000 current US$ | +400.0% |
| 2002 | 180,000 current US$ | +80.0% |
| 2003 | 70,000 current US$ | -61.1% |
| 2004 | 180,000 current US$ | +157.1% |
| 2005 | 95,000 current US$ | -47.2% |
| 2006 | 10,000 current US$ | -89.5% |
| 2007 | 53,333 current US$ | +433.3% |
| 2008 | 96,667 current US$ | +81.3% |
| 2009 | 140,000 current US$ | +44.8% |
| 2010 | 90,000 current US$ | -35.7% |
| 2011 | 40,000 current US$ | -55.6% |
| 2012 | 70,000 current US$ | +75.0% |
| 2013 | 734,820 current US$ | +949.7% |
| 2014 | 2.43 million current US$ | +230.4% |
| 2015 | 248,366 current US$ | -89.8% |
| 2016 | 876,120 current US$ | +252.8% |
| 2017 | 264,026 current US$ | -69.9% |
| 2018 | 87,869 current US$ | -66.7% |
| 2019 | 79,545 current US$ | -9.5% |
| 2020 | 139,894 current US$ | +75.9% |
| 2021 | 472,024 current US$ | +237.4% |
| 2022 | 495,814 current US$ | +5.0% |
| 2023 | 693,092 current US$ | +39.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 68,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 130,000 current US$ | 5 |
| 1970s | 1.19 million current US$ | 140,000 current US$ | 3.13 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.54 million current US$ | 260,000 current US$ | 4.11 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 416,000 current US$ | 55,000 current US$ | 960,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 94,500 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 491,835 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 2.43 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 450,206 current US$ | 139,894 current US$ | 693,092 current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 94 Guinea 826,937 current US$ compare
- 95 Bulgaria 800,000 current US$ compare
- 96 Burundi 784,991 current US$ compare
- 98 Republic of Korea 680,000 current US$ compare
- 99 Timor-Leste 669,425 current US$ compare
- 100 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 655,441 current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Eswatini
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24,761 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1,889 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 585,648 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 13.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 912,632 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 178,216 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 7.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 165,318 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -567,147 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -415,180 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Eswatini?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Eswatini was 693,092 current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 4.11 million current US$ in 1981.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1965.
- How does Eswatini rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Eswatini ranks 97th out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.