Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) currently reports 318.39 million current US$ against 33.86 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 284.52 million current US$.
That makes Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)'s figure about 9.4 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ahead.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 46 groups.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.71 million current US$ | 46,429 current US$ | 1.66 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1970s | 11.17 million current US$ | 53,333 current US$ | 11.11 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 22.33 million current US$ | 18.94 million current US$ | 3.38 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 73.98 million current US$ | 33.34 million current US$ | 40.64 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 158.78 million current US$ | 16.20 million current US$ | 142.58 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 372.32 million current US$ | 36.63 million current US$ | 335.68 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 394.48 million current US$ | 40.38 million current US$ | 354.10 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), at 318.39 million current US$ against 33.86 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
- 284.52 million current US$, with Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.