Mozambique vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden gaps over time
- Mozambique
- Russia
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 76.52 million current US$ against 69.65 million current US$ in Russia, a difference of 6.87 million current US$.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 5th and Russia ranks 7th of 142 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.81 million current US$ | 11.30 million current US$ | 58.51 million current US$ | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 51.72 million current US$ | 41.14 million current US$ | 10.58 million current US$ | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Mozambique or Russia?
- Mozambique, at 76.52 million current US$ against 69.65 million current US$ in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Mozambique and Russia?
- 6.87 million current US$, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Russia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Mozambique and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Mozambique ranks 5th and Russia ranks 7th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.