Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Mozambique
Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 76.52 million current US$ in 2023. ▲ Rising
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Mozambique, 1968–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Mozambique recorded 76.52 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in 2023.
The figure is up 7.8% on the previous year and down 43.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Mozambique peaked at 136.08 million current US$ in 1990 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1968.
That places Mozambique 5th out of 142 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 50 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1975 | 9.00 million current US$ | +89900.0% |
| 1976 | 15.41 million current US$ | +71.2% |
| 1977 | 26.41 million current US$ | +71.4% |
| 1978 | 25.64 million current US$ | -2.9% |
| 1979 | 40.33 million current US$ | +57.3% |
| 1980 | 35.81 million current US$ | -11.2% |
| 1981 | 31.55 million current US$ | -11.9% |
| 1982 | 46.26 million current US$ | +46.6% |
| 1983 | 36.73 million current US$ | -20.6% |
| 1984 | 30.64 million current US$ | -16.6% |
| 1985 | 33.96 million current US$ | +10.8% |
| 1986 | 68.85 million current US$ | +102.7% |
| 1987 | 54.48 million current US$ | -20.9% |
| 1988 | 89.35 million current US$ | +64.0% |
| 1989 | 99.50 million current US$ | +11.4% |
| 1990 | 136.08 million current US$ | +36.8% |
| 1991 | 134.99 million current US$ | -0.8% |
| 1992 | 97.20 million current US$ | -28.0% |
| 1993 | 71.78 million current US$ | -26.2% |
| 1994 | 73.53 million current US$ | +2.4% |
| 1995 | 54.15 million current US$ | -26.4% |
| 1996 | 61.25 million current US$ | +13.1% |
| 1997 | 52.05 million current US$ | -15.0% |
| 1998 | 31.90 million current US$ | -38.7% |
| 1999 | 51.42 million current US$ | +61.2% |
| 2000 | 46.27 million current US$ | -10.0% |
| 2001 | 42.62 million current US$ | -7.9% |
| 2002 | 45.27 million current US$ | +6.2% |
| 2003 | 56.53 million current US$ | +24.9% |
| 2004 | 67.92 million current US$ | +20.1% |
| 2005 | 79.25 million current US$ | +16.7% |
| 2006 | 91.75 million current US$ | +15.8% |
| 2007 | 103.57 million current US$ | +12.9% |
| 2008 | 119.60 million current US$ | +15.5% |
| 2009 | 98.86 million current US$ | -17.3% |
| 2010 | 84.54 million current US$ | -14.5% |
| 2011 | 108.81 million current US$ | +28.7% |
| 2012 | 114.71 million current US$ | +5.4% |
| 2013 | 136.02 million current US$ | +18.6% |
| 2014 | 119.17 million current US$ | -12.4% |
| 2015 | 90.72 million current US$ | -23.9% |
| 2016 | 67.33 million current US$ | -25.8% |
| 2017 | 55.28 million current US$ | -17.9% |
| 2018 | 75.08 million current US$ | +35.8% |
| 2019 | 86.05 million current US$ | +14.6% |
| 2020 | 79.79 million current US$ | -7.3% |
| 2021 | 91.42 million current US$ | +14.6% |
| 2022 | 70.97 million current US$ | -22.4% |
| 2023 | 76.52 million current US$ | +7.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 1 |
| 1970s | 23.36 million current US$ | 9.00 million current US$ | 40.33 million current US$ | 5 |
| 1980s | 52.71 million current US$ | 30.64 million current US$ | 99.50 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 76.44 million current US$ | 31.90 million current US$ | 136.08 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 75.16 million current US$ | 42.62 million current US$ | 119.60 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 93.77 million current US$ | 55.28 million current US$ | 136.02 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 79.68 million current US$ | 70.97 million current US$ | 91.42 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 2 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 91.43 million current US$ compare
- 3 Afghanistan 85.53 million current US$ compare
- 4 Ethiopia 77.41 million current US$ compare
- 6 Somalia 73.80 million current US$ compare
- 7 Russian Federation 69.65 million current US$ compare
- 8 Sudan 59.98 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Mozambique
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 12.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 17.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 55.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 143.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 35.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 60.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 38.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 120.62 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Mozambique?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Mozambique was 76.52 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 136.08 million current US$ in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1968.
- How does Mozambique rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Mozambique ranks 5th out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is down 43.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.