Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 85.53 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Afghanistan, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Afghanistan is 85.53 million current US$, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 8.2% on the previous year and down 31.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Afghanistan peaked at 145.78 million current US$ in 2018 and was at its lowest, 40,000 current US$, in 1967.
That places Afghanistan 3rd out of 142 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 150,000 current US$ | — |
| 1966 | 95,000 current US$ | -36.7% |
| 1967 | 40,000 current US$ | -57.9% |
| 1968 | 250,000 current US$ | +525.0% |
| 1969 | 510,000 current US$ | +104.0% |
| 1970 | 570,000 current US$ | +11.8% |
| 1971 | 590,000 current US$ | +3.5% |
| 1972 | 810,000 current US$ | +37.3% |
| 1973 | 420,000 current US$ | -48.1% |
| 1974 | 1.10 million current US$ | +161.9% |
| 1975 | 570,000 current US$ | -48.2% |
| 1976 | 990,000 current US$ | +73.7% |
| 1977 | 860,000 current US$ | -13.1% |
| 1978 | 450,000 current US$ | -47.7% |
| 1979 | 750,000 current US$ | +66.7% |
| 1980 | 1.05 million current US$ | +40.0% |
| 1981 | 555,000 current US$ | -47.1% |
| 1982 | 60,000 current US$ | -89.2% |
| 1983 | 460,000 current US$ | +666.7% |
| 1984 | 1.49 million current US$ | +223.9% |
| 1985 | 1.02 million current US$ | -31.5% |
| 1986 | 2.81 million current US$ | +175.5% |
| 1987 | 5.44 million current US$ | +93.6% |
| 1988 | 14.72 million current US$ | +170.6% |
| 1989 | 16.70 million current US$ | +13.5% |
| 1990 | 16.05 million current US$ | -3.9% |
| 1991 | 4.84 million current US$ | -69.8% |
| 1992 | 12.97 million current US$ | +168.0% |
| 1993 | 9.09 million current US$ | -29.9% |
| 1994 | 12.35 million current US$ | +35.9% |
| 1995 | 15.30 million current US$ | +23.9% |
| 1996 | 14.75 million current US$ | -3.6% |
| 1997 | 12.20 million current US$ | -17.3% |
| 1998 | 12.51 million current US$ | +2.5% |
| 1999 | 10.31 million current US$ | -17.6% |
| 2000 | 11.50 million current US$ | +11.5% |
| 2001 | 20.60 million current US$ | +79.1% |
| 2002 | 27.52 million current US$ | +33.6% |
| 2003 | 41.88 million current US$ | +52.2% |
| 2004 | 55.68 million current US$ | +33.0% |
| 2005 | 44.22 million current US$ | -20.6% |
| 2006 | 46.42 million current US$ | +5.0% |
| 2007 | 56.15 million current US$ | +21.0% |
| 2008 | 73.89 million current US$ | +31.6% |
| 2009 | 80.07 million current US$ | +8.4% |
| 2010 | 91.72 million current US$ | +14.5% |
| 2011 | 114.98 million current US$ | +25.4% |
| 2012 | 107.60 million current US$ | -6.4% |
| 2013 | 125.52 million current US$ | +16.7% |
| 2014 | 137.07 million current US$ | +9.2% |
| 2015 | 103.08 million current US$ | -24.8% |
| 2016 | 104.29 million current US$ | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 118.67 million current US$ | +13.8% |
| 2018 | 145.78 million current US$ | +22.8% |
| 2019 | 132.93 million current US$ | -8.8% |
| 2020 | 114.03 million current US$ | -14.2% |
| 2021 | 115.26 million current US$ | +1.1% |
| 2022 | 93.17 million current US$ | -19.2% |
| 2023 | 85.53 million current US$ | -8.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 209,000 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 510,000 current US$ | 5 |
| 1970s | 711,000 current US$ | 420,000 current US$ | 1.10 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.43 million current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 16.70 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.04 million current US$ | 4.84 million current US$ | 16.05 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 45.79 million current US$ | 11.50 million current US$ | 80.07 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 118.16 million current US$ | 91.72 million current US$ | 145.78 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 102.00 million current US$ | 85.53 million current US$ | 115.26 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
- 1 Ukraine 240.60 million current US$ compare
- 2 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 91.43 million current US$ compare
- 4 Ethiopia 77.41 million current US$ compare
- 5 Mozambique 76.52 million current US$ compare
- 6 Somalia 73.80 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Afghanistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.39 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 43.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 370.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 38.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 275.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 23.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 142.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 16.33 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 165.64 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Afghanistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Afghanistan was 85.53 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 145.78 million current US$ in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 40,000 current US$ in 1967.
- How does Afghanistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Afghanistan ranks 3rd out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.