Euro area vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Euro area
6.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Tanzania, United Republic of
63.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
34th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Euro area
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
050100150196219922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 56.95 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 10.2 times Euro area's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 34th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 37th of 46 groups.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 0.006 current US$ per square kilometre 58.74 current US$ per square kilometre 58.73 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 10.92 current US$ per square kilometre 89.48 current US$ per square kilometre 78.56 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 8.45 current US$ per square kilometre 72.71 current US$ per square kilometre 64.26 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Euro area or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Euro area and Tanzania, United Republic of?
56.95 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Tanzania, United Republic of?
17 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2004.
How do Euro area and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Euro area ranks 34th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 37th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/tanzania/">Euro area vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.