Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden square in Tanzania
Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden square was 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Tanzania, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tanzania stood at 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.1% on the previous year and down 55.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tanzania peaked at 168.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Tanzania ranks 37th of 141 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden square in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.2032 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.0% |
| 1964 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +494.4% |
| 1965 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 1967 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.8% |
| 1968 | 3.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.1% |
| 1969 | 9.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +153.0% |
| 1970 | 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1971 | 12.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 1972 | 18.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.1% |
| 1973 | 36.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.7% |
| 1974 | 39.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1975 | 62.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 1976 | 58.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1977 | 64.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1978 | 72.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1979 | 105.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 1980 | 88.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1981 | 86.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1982 | 83.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1983 | 78.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1984 | 62.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1985 | 55.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1986 | 120.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.2% |
| 1987 | 86.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 1988 | 117 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.5% |
| 1989 | 102.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1990 | 168.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.4% |
| 1991 | 161.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1992 | 105.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 1993 | 102.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1994 | 57.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.6% |
| 1995 | 51.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 1996 | 73.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 1997 | 54.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 1998 | 67.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1999 | 52.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2000 | 71.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 2001 | 53.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 2002 | 69.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 2003 | 74.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2004 | 94.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 2005 | 103.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2006 | 126.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 2007 | 121.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2008 | 141.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2009 | 109.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 2010 | 108.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2011 | 141.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 2012 | 131.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2013 | 141.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2014 | 61.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.9% |
| 2015 | 116.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.4% |
| 2016 | 101.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2017 | 153.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.5% |
| 2018 | 141.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2019 | 79.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.9% |
| 2020 | 82.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2021 | 94.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2022 | 67.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2023 | 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
Tanzania compared with similar countries
- Tanzania's 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre, 4.7× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tanzania's 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 30.57 current US$ per square kilometre, 2.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden square in Tanzania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1963 | +800.0% | 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2032 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1964 | +494.4% | 0.2032 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1970s | 47.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 105.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 87.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 120.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 89.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 51.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 168.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 96.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 141.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 117.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 153.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 76.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 94.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
- 34 South Sudan 77.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Ethiopia 68.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Malawi 66.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Jordan 61.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Yemen 61.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Myanmar 59.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tanzania?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tanzania was 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 168.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Tanzania rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Tanzania ranks 37th out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 55.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.