Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
63.12 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 6.1%
World rank
37th
of 141 countries
All-time high
168.85 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1990
All-time low
0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
61
1962–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of stood at 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.1% on the previous year and down 55.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 168.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 37th of 141 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.2032 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.0% |
| 1964 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +494.4% |
| 1965 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 1967 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.8% |
| 1968 | 3.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.1% |
| 1969 | 9.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +153.0% |
| 1970 | 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1971 | 12.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 1972 | 18.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.1% |
| 1973 | 36.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.7% |
| 1974 | 39.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1975 | 62.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 1976 | 58.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1977 | 64.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1978 | 72.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1979 | 105.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 1980 | 88.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1981 | 86.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1982 | 83.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1983 | 78.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1984 | 62.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1985 | 55.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1986 | 120.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.2% |
| 1987 | 86.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 1988 | 117 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.5% |
| 1989 | 102.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1990 | 168.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.4% |
| 1991 | 161.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1992 | 105.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 1993 | 102.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1994 | 57.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.6% |
| 1995 | 51.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 1996 | 73.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 1997 | 54.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 1998 | 67.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1999 | 52.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2000 | 71.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 2001 | 53.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 2002 | 69.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 2003 | 74.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2004 | 94.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 2005 | 103.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2006 | 126.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 2007 | 121.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2008 | 141.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2009 | 109.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 2010 | 108.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2011 | 141.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 2012 | 131.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2013 | 141.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2014 | 61.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.9% |
| 2015 | 116.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.4% |
| 2016 | 101.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2017 | 153.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.5% |
| 2018 | 141.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2019 | 79.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.9% |
| 2020 | 82.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2021 | 94.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2022 | 67.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2023 | 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1970s | 47.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 105.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 87.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 120.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 89.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 51.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 168.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 96.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 141.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 117.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 153.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 76.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 94.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 34 South Sudan 77.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Ethiopia 68.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Malawi 66.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Jordan 61.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Yemen 61.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Myanmar 59.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of was 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 168.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 37th out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 55.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.