Georgia vs Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Georgia
315.58 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income
39.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
11th
Low & middle income rank
13th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Georgia
  • Low & middle income
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 315.58 current US$ per square kilometre against 39.99 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 275.59 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 7.9 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 11th and Low & middle income ranks 13th of 141 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 22.69 current US$ per square kilometre 15.82 current US$ per square kilometre 6.87 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 114.61 current US$ per square kilometre 28.34 current US$ per square kilometre 86.27 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 237.44 current US$ per square kilometre 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre 189.22 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 265.63 current US$ per square kilometre 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre 221.29 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Georgia or Low & middle income?
Georgia, at 315.58 current US$ per square kilometre against 39.99 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Georgia and Low & middle income?
275.59 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Low & middle income?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Low & middle income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Georgia ranks 11th and Low & middle income ranks 13th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/low-and-middle-income/">Georgia vs Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.