Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 39.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
39.99 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 8.3%
Rank
13th
of 46 groups
All-time high
61.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2015
All-time low
0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Low & middle income recorded 39.99 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of down 8.3% on the previous year and down 19.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Low & middle income peaked at 61.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Low & middle income 13th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0381 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.8% |
| 1963 | 0.0961 current US$ per square kilometre | +152.5% |
| 1964 | 0.1979 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.9% |
| 1965 | 0.2406 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1967 | 0.3736 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.3% |
| 1968 | 0.5943 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.1% |
| 1969 | 0.7904 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 1970 | 0.816 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1971 | 0.8801 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1972 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.2% |
| 1973 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.4% |
| 1974 | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.0% |
| 1975 | 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.7% |
| 1976 | 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1977 | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1978 | 6.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1979 | 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.1% |
| 1980 | 9.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1981 | 8.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1982 | 8.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1983 | 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1984 | 7.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1985 | 8.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1986 | 10.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 1987 | 12.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1988 | 14.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1989 | 17.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 1990 | 19.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1991 | 20.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1992 | 23.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1993 | 16.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.9% |
| 1994 | 17.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1995 | 15.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1996 | 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1997 | 15.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1998 | 13.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1999 | 14.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2000 | 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2001 | 15.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2002 | 16.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2003 | 23.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.1% |
| 2004 | 26.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2005 | 29.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2006 | 37.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 2007 | 38.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2008 | 40.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2009 | 39.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2010 | 38.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2011 | 47.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2012 | 46.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2013 | 49.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2014 | 55.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2015 | 61.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2016 | 43.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 2017 | 48.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2018 | 48.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 43.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2020 | 44.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2021 | 48.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2022 | 43.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2023 | 39.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2932 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7904 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.816 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 10.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 17.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 28.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 10 Liberia 345.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Georgia 315.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Haiti 312.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Bangladesh 296.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Syrian Arab Republic 288.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Uganda 226.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Sao Tome and Principe 201.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Low & middle income was 39.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 61.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Low & middle income ranks 13th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.