Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 81.99 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 15.8 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0031 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1189 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1158 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.1103 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0189 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.04 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 6.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 86.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 79.82 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 8.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.56 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 94.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 87.95 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 104.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 97.35 current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
- 81.99 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
- How do Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.