Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
5.54 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 9.8%
Rank
35th
of 46 groups
All-time high
10.04 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) stood at 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 9.8% on the previous year and down 21.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | +600.0% |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.0941 current US$ per square kilometre | +704.5% |
| 1971 | 0.0771 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1972 | 0.1436 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.2% |
| 1973 | 0.3658 current US$ per square kilometre | +154.8% |
| 1974 | 0.6077 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.1% |
| 1975 | 0.5088 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1976 | 0.7008 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.7% |
| 1977 | 0.8093 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1978 | 0.4674 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.2% |
| 1979 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.1% |
| 1980 | 0.8821 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1981 | 0.6939 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1982 | 0.8853 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 1983 | 0.9587 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1984 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1985 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.8% |
| 1986 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 1987 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1988 | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.8% |
| 1989 | 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.6% |
| 1990 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 1991 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.7% |
| 1992 | 7.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1993 | 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1994 | 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1995 | 7.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1996 | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1997 | 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.8% |
| 1998 | 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 1999 | 8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.6% |
| 2000 | 8.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2001 | 6.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2002 | 6.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2003 | 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2004 | 9.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.9% |
| 2005 | 8.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2006 | 9.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2007 | 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2008 | 10.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2009 | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 2010 | 8.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2011 | 7.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2012 | 6.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 2013 | 7.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2014 | 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2015 | 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 2016 | 6.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2017 | 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 6.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2019 | 6.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2020 | 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2021 | 9.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.4% |
| 2022 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.4% |
| 2023 | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.478 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0771 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6939 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 32 Zimbabwe 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Kenya 79.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 South Sudan 77.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Ethiopia 68.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Malawi 66.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Tanzania, United Republic of 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Jordan 61.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.