Cuba vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Cuba
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 59.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 51.85 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Cuba's figure about 7.4 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 37th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 151 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0931 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0044 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0887 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.3857 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2129 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1728 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.1729 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9661 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2000s | 32.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.01 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2010s | 97.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 87.14 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2020s | 108.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 99.06 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Cuba or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Cuba, at 59.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Cuba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 51.85 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Cuba ranks 37th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.