Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) is 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 5.2% on the previous year and down 29.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 12.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0013 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0044 current US$ per square kilometre | +250.0% |
| 1965 | 0.005 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1966 | 0.0176 current US$ per square kilometre | +250.0% |
| 1967 | 0.017 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0766 current US$ per square kilometre | +351.9% |
| 1969 | 0.0295 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.5% |
| 1970 | 0.0427 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0352 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1972 | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | +201.8% |
| 1973 | 0.1331 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 1974 | 0.3687 current US$ per square kilometre | +176.9% |
| 1975 | 0.5288 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.4% |
| 1976 | 0.4648 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1977 | 0.1677 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.9% |
| 1978 | 0.2468 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 1979 | 0.3366 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1980 | 0.7066 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.9% |
| 1981 | 0.3555 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.7% |
| 1982 | 0.3906 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1983 | 0.444 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1984 | 0.5998 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1985 | 0.6946 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1986 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.5% |
| 1987 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1988 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +147.8% |
| 1989 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 1990 | 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 1991 | 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1992 | 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1993 | 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1994 | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1995 | 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 1996 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1997 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1998 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 1999 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2000 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2001 | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2002 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.0% |
| 2003 | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2004 | 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 2006 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 2007 | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2008 | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2009 | 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2010 | 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 2011 | 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.5% |
| 2012 | 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2013 | 11.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.4% |
| 2014 | 11.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2016 | 12.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2017 | 10.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2018 | 11.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2019 | 9.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 2020 | 10.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2021 | 11.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2022 | 7.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 2023 | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0169 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0766 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2431 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0352 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5288 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3555 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 10.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- 32 Honduras 92.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Lao People's Democratic Republic 74.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Myanmar 69.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Somalia 64.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Nicaragua 63.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Cuba 59.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Sri Lanka 59.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 12.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 35th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.