East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 74.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 65.95 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 9.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1968 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 35th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 33rd of 44 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0531 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0433 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0097 current US$ per square kilometre | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1970s | 0.2248 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9261 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7014 current US$ per square kilometre | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 1980s | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6797 current US$ per square kilometre | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 1990s | 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.96 current US$ per square kilometre | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 2000s | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.46 current US$ per square kilometre | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 2010s | 10.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 94.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 84.18 current US$ per square kilometre | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 2020s | 9.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 77.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.63 current US$ per square kilometre | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 74.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 65.95 current US$ per square kilometre, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 35th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 33rd of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.