Croatia vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 160.36 million current US$ against 146.26 million current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 14.10 million current US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Latvia ahead.
Croatia ranks 103rd and Latvia ranks 100th of 180 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57.74 million current US$ | 74.15 million current US$ | 16.41 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 99.09 million current US$ | 106.46 million current US$ | 7.37 million current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Croatia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 160.36 million current US$ against 146.26 million current US$ in Croatia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Croatia and Latvia?
- 14.10 million current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2004.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Croatia ranks 103rd and Latvia ranks 100th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.