Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Latvia

Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps was 160.36 million current US$ in 2004. ▲ Rising

Latest (2004)
160.36 million current US$
Change on year
up 44.2%
World rank
100th
of 180 countries
All-time high
160.36 million current US$
in 2004
All-time low
3.42 million current US$
in 1991
Years of data
14
1991–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Latvia, 1991–2004

050.0M100.0M150.0M1991199720041991: 3.4M current US$1992: 80.3M current US$1993: 33.1M current US$1994: 50.1M current US$1995: 60.1M current US$1996: 69.0M current US$1997: 76.7M current US$1998: 94.6M current US$1999: 94.3M current US$2000: 86.3M current US$2001: 102.0M current US$2002: 72.5M current US$2003: 111.2M current US$2004: 160.4M current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Latvia is 160.36 million current US$, measured in 2004. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 44.2% on the previous year and up 220.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Latvia peaked at 160.36 million current US$ in 2004 and was at its lowest, 3.42 million current US$, in 1991.

That places Latvia 100th out of 180 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled in Latvia, 1991 to 2004.
Year current US$ Change
1991 3.42 million current US$
1992 80.27 million current US$ +2247.1%
1993 33.10 million current US$ -58.8%
1994 50.11 million current US$ +51.4%
1995 60.13 million current US$ +20.0%
1996 69.04 million current US$ +14.8%
1997 76.68 million current US$ +11.1%
1998 94.59 million current US$ +23.4%
1999 94.33 million current US$ -0.3%
2000 86.29 million current US$ -8.5%
2001 101.96 million current US$ +18.2%
2002 72.51 million current US$ -28.9%
2003 111.19 million current US$ +53.3%
2004 160.36 million current US$ +44.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 62.41 million current US$ 3.42 million current US$ 94.59 million current US$ 9
2000s 106.46 million current US$ 72.51 million current US$ 160.36 million current US$ 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 97 Solomon Islands 175.09 million current US$ compare
  2. 98 Nicaragua 169.96 million current US$ compare
  3. 99 Fiji 165.17 million current US$ compare
  4. 101 Congo 156.82 million current US$ compare
  5. 102 Angola 154.24 million current US$ compare
  6. 103 Croatia 146.26 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 227 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Latvia?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Latvia was 160.36 million current US$ in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 160.36 million current US$ in 2004.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 3.42 million current US$ in 1991.
How does Latvia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
Latvia ranks 100th out of 180 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 220.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-gaps-filled/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-gaps-filled/latvia/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 11,650 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.