Latvia vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 169.96 million current US$ against 160.36 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 9.60 million current US$.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 100th and Nicaragua ranks 98th of 180 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62.41 million current US$ | 477.48 million current US$ | 415.07 million current US$ | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 106.46 million current US$ | 586.92 million current US$ | 480.46 million current US$ | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 169.96 million current US$ against 160.36 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 9.60 million current US$, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 100th and Nicaragua ranks 98th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.