Barbados vs Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Barbados
34,419 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Low income
1,557 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
16th
Low income rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Low income
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 32,862 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 22.1 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 16th and Low income ranks 16th of 178 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Low income Difference Ahead
1960s 2,331 current US$ per square kilometre 46.6 current US$ per square kilometre 2,285 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 9,567 current US$ per square kilometre 88.76 current US$ per square kilometre 9,479 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 9,933 current US$ per square kilometre 300.74 current US$ per square kilometre 9,632 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 10,300 current US$ per square kilometre 426.93 current US$ per square kilometre 9,873 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 20,551 current US$ per square kilometre 925.92 current US$ per square kilometre 19,625 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre 1,647 current US$ per square kilometre 32,772 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Barbados or Low income?
Barbados, at 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2010.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Barbados and Low income?
32,862 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Low income?
45 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2010.
How do Barbados and Low income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 16th and Low income ranks 16th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/low-income/">Barbados vs Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.