Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1,557 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.7%
Rank
16th
of 44 groups
All-time high
1,884 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
25.76 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Low income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Low income recorded 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 2.7% on the previous year and up 11.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Low income peaked at 1,884 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 25.76 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Low income 16th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 25.76 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 38.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.6% |
| 1963 | 35.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1964 | 44.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 1965 | 54.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1966 | 50.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1967 | 51.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1968 | 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1969 | 41.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1970 | 36.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1971 | 42.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1972 | 48.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1973 | 58.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1974 | 79.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.4% |
| 1975 | 94.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1976 | 92.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1977 | 107.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1978 | 141.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 1979 | 186.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1980 | 220.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1981 | 227.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1982 | 229.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1983 | 224.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1984 | 229.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1985 | 272.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1986 | 327.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1987 | 382.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1988 | 459.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1989 | 434.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1990 | 514.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1991 | 493.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1992 | 505.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1993 | 434.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1994 | 459.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1995 | 407.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1996 | 372.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1997 | 375.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1998 | 361.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1999 | 344.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2000 | 338.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2001 | 368.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2002 | 574.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 2003 | 1,008 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.3% |
| 2004 | 864.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2005 | 950.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2006 | 1,060 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2007 | 1,177 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2008 | 1,431 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 2009 | 1,487 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2010 | 1,647 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2011 | 1,884 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2012 | 1,353 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 2013 | 1,401 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2014 | 1,399 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2015 | 1,315 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2016 | 1,361 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2017 | 1,482 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2018 | 1,496 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 1,486 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2020 | 1,584 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2021 | 1,741 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2022 | 1,516 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2023 | 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 54.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 88.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 186.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 300.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 220.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 459.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 426.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 344.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 514.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 925.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 338.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,487 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,482 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,315 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,884 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,599 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,516 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,741 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 13 Sao Tome and Principe 38,526 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Mauritius 38,188 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Malta 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Barbados 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Samoa 34,127 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Comoros 29,668 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Seychelles 28,657 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Low income was 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 1,884 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 25.76 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Low income ranks 16th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.