Belarus vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Belarus
479.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
459.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
131st
Congo rank
132nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Belarus
  • Congo
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 479.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 20.09 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo ahead.

Belarus ranks 131st and Congo ranks 132nd of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1479 current US$ per square kilometre 443.37 current US$ per square kilometre 443.22 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 362.82 current US$ per square kilometre 1,379 current US$ per square kilometre 1,016 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 519.76 current US$ per square kilometre 609.38 current US$ per square kilometre 89.61 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 607.4 current US$ per square kilometre 365.35 current US$ per square kilometre 242.05 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Belarus or Congo?
Belarus, at 479.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Belarus and Congo?
20.09 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Congo?
23 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Congo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Belarus ranks 131st and Congo ranks 132nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/congo-rep/">Belarus vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.