Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Congo
Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
459.2 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 14.4%
World rank
132nd
of 178 countries
All-time high
3,982 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Congo, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Congo stood at 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.4% on the previous year and up 55.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Congo peaked at 3,982 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Congo 132nd out of 178 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Congo, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 8.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +2481.8% |
| 1963 | 15.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.5% |
| 1964 | 50.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +218.4% |
| 1965 | 44.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 1966 | 56.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1967 | 52.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1968 | 59.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1969 | 44.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 1970 | 37.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1971 | 41.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1972 | 51.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1973 | 61.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1974 | 86.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.3% |
| 1975 | 140 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.6% |
| 1976 | 173.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 1977 | 111.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
| 1978 | 170.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.8% |
| 1979 | 183.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1980 | 183.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 139.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 1982 | 179.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1983 | 179.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1984 | 218.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1985 | 184.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1986 | 298.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.8% |
| 1987 | 384.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 1988 | 233.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 1989 | 250.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1990 | 619.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +147.1% |
| 1991 | 368.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 1992 | 315.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1993 | 345.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1994 | 758.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.7% |
| 1995 | 355.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.2% |
| 1996 | 1,185 current US$ per square kilometre | +233.9% |
| 1997 | 773.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1998 | 176.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.1% |
| 1999 | 361.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.6% |
| 2000 | 72.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 2001 | 93.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 2002 | 141.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.1% |
| 2003 | 126.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2004 | 177.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.8% |
| 2005 | 3,982 current US$ per square kilometre | +2137.4% |
| 2006 | 659.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.4% |
| 2007 | 252.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.7% |
| 2008 | 1,259 current US$ per square kilometre | +398.3% |
| 2009 | 739.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.3% |
| 2010 | 3,664 current US$ per square kilometre | +395.6% |
| 2011 | 592.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.8% |
| 2012 | 259.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.1% |
| 2013 | 294.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2014 | 226.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 2015 | 156.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.9% |
| 2016 | 136.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 2017 | 147.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2018 | 268.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.1% |
| 2019 | 348.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.1% |
| 2020 | 316.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2021 | 284.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2022 | 401.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.8% |
| 2023 | 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre | 59.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 105.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 183.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 225.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 139.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 384.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 525.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 176.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,185 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 750.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 72.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,982 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 609.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 136.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,664 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 365.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 284.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 129 Sudan 561.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 130 Pakistan 529.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 131 Belarus 479.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 133 Eritrea 437.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 134 Peru 423.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Bolivia 419.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 18,209 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 891,418 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.80 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 542,370 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 677,421 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 96.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42,394 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 3.01 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Congo?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Congo was 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 3,982 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Congo rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Congo ranks 132nd out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 55.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.