Congo vs Peru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Congo
459.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
423.44 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
132nd
Peru rank
134th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Peru
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 423.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 35.76 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 132nd and Peru ranks 134th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 6 and Peru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 37 current US$ per square kilometre 18.34 current US$ per square kilometre 18.66 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1970s 105.84 current US$ per square kilometre 57.25 current US$ per square kilometre 48.6 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 225.18 current US$ per square kilometre 185.81 current US$ per square kilometre 39.36 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 525.92 current US$ per square kilometre 335.41 current US$ per square kilometre 190.51 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 750.47 current US$ per square kilometre 335.57 current US$ per square kilometre 414.9 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 609.38 current US$ per square kilometre 208.93 current US$ per square kilometre 400.45 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 365.35 current US$ per square kilometre 399.8 current US$ per square kilometre 34.45 current US$ per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Congo or Peru?
Congo, at 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 423.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Congo and Peru?
35.76 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Peru rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Congo ranks 132nd and Peru ranks 134th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Peru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/peru/">Congo vs Peru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.