Congo vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Congo
459.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
529.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
132nd
Pakistan rank
130th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Pakistan
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 529.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 70.78 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Congo ranks 132nd and Pakistan ranks 130th of 178 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 37 current US$ per square kilometre 495.5 current US$ per square kilometre 458.5 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 105.84 current US$ per square kilometre 446.74 current US$ per square kilometre 340.89 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 225.18 current US$ per square kilometre 644.49 current US$ per square kilometre 419.32 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 525.92 current US$ per square kilometre 591.59 current US$ per square kilometre 65.67 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 750.47 current US$ per square kilometre 1,157 current US$ per square kilometre 406.61 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 609.38 current US$ per square kilometre 2,365 current US$ per square kilometre 1,756 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 365.35 current US$ per square kilometre 893.14 current US$ per square kilometre 527.79 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Congo or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 529.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 459.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Congo and Pakistan?
70.78 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Pakistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Congo ranks 132nd and Pakistan ranks 130th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/pakistan/">Congo vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.