Belize vs Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Belize
770.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
895.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
123rd
Cuba rank
120th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Belize
  • Cuba
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 895.45 current US$ per square kilometre against 770.54 current US$ per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 124.91 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 123rd and Cuba ranks 120th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 4 and Cuba in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 183.84 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1862 current US$ per square kilometre 183.65 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
1970s 335.69 current US$ per square kilometre 130.52 current US$ per square kilometre 205.16 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
1980s 693.73 current US$ per square kilometre 80.47 current US$ per square kilometre 613.27 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
1990s 828.98 current US$ per square kilometre 373.42 current US$ per square kilometre 455.56 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2000s 496.32 current US$ per square kilometre 623.27 current US$ per square kilometre 126.95 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 859.21 current US$ per square kilometre 3,435 current US$ per square kilometre 2,576 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 708.34 current US$ per square kilometre 1,039 current US$ per square kilometre 330.84 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Belize or Cuba?
Cuba, at 895.45 current US$ per square kilometre against 770.54 current US$ per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Belize and Cuba?
124.91 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Cuba?
57 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Belize and Cuba rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Belize ranks 123rd and Cuba ranks 120th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/cuba/">Belize vs Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.