Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Cuba
Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 895.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
895.45 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 4.0%
World rank
120th
of 178 countries
All-time high
22,013 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
0.0931 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1967
Years of data
57
1964–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Cuba, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Cuba stood at 895.45 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.0% on the previous year and up 26.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Cuba peaked at 22,013 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.0931 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1967.
Cuba ranks 120th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 0.1862 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0.0931 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1968 | 0.2793 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1970 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +266.7% |
| 1971 | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1972 | 14.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +180.0% |
| 1973 | 28.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.4% |
| 1974 | 107.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +277.5% |
| 1975 | 132.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1976 | 242.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.4% |
| 1977 | 303.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 1978 | 247.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1979 | 222.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1980 | 102.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.7% |
| 1981 | 24.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.2% |
| 1982 | 14.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.6% |
| 1983 | 17.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 1984 | 59.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +237.2% |
| 1985 | 23 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.6% |
| 1986 | 34.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.6% |
| 1987 | 93.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +169.4% |
| 1988 | 35.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.0% |
| 1989 | 398.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +1024.7% |
| 1990 | 314.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1991 | 178.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.0% |
| 1992 | 111.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1993 | 255.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +128.3% |
| 1994 | 339.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 1995 | 461.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 1996 | 454.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1997 | 486.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1998 | 670.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 1999 | 460.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.4% |
| 2000 | 351.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 2001 | 425.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 2002 | 519.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 2003 | 588.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2004 | 700.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 2005 | 658.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2006 | 561.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2007 | 556.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2008 | 893.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.6% |
| 2009 | 976.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2010 | 1,061 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2011 | 608.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.6% |
| 2012 | 565.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2013 | 706.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2014 | 727.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2015 | 1,745 current US$ per square kilometre | +139.9% |
| 2016 | 22,013 current US$ per square kilometre | +1161.5% |
| 2017 | 3,115 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.9% |
| 2018 | 2,704 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2019 | 1,108 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.0% |
| 2020 | 1,292 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 2021 | 1,108 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2022 | 861.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 2023 | 895.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1862 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0931 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2793 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1970s | 130.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 303.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 80.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 398.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 373.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 111.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 670.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 623.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 351.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 976.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3,435 current US$ per square kilometre | 565.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 22,013 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,039 current US$ per square kilometre | 861.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,292 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 117 Madagascar 975.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Zambia 966.54 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Azerbaijan 924.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 121 Colombia 878.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 122 Trinidad and Tobago 795.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Belize 770.54 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Cuba
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,165 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 582,429 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 6.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 18.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 550,653 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.00 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Cuba?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Cuba was 895.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 22,013 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0931 current US$ per square kilometre in 1967.
- How does Cuba rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Cuba ranks 120th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.